In order to learn more about the music industry and how
music videos are created, I looked into how controversy is used and how it can
effect different viewers. One article I came across relating to this was
featured in Q Magazine. It was created by writer Dorian Lynskey and
metaphorically titled, "Video Games." Many people argue controversial
topics are mostly used for attention seeking purposes to promote an artist and
their single. Alternatively others argue that they are used artistically to
share personal and political messages. Lynskey's view was the first and so this
particular article had a negative approach towards, what he viewed as,
controversial music videos.
The so called "video games" mentioned in the
title essentially stem from, what he believes to be, a cat and mouse effect
developed from the artists controversial use of certain themes in their music
videos to gain people's attention. He believes that controversy and long music
videos, which are also known as "mini-movies" go hand in hand. Lynskey
puts forward his views on this by inserting David Grohl's quote, that when this
happens, "it's time to quit." This introduction sets the tone for the
rest of the article: overwhelmingly pessimistic.
He criticises artists such as Rihanna and Taylor Swift
for creating "event videos" which are "long, self-regarding,
hubristic and flamboyantly expensive." Disparagingly, he belittles their
efforts by jokingly stating that there's "bonus points for celebrity
cameos, obvious homages to obvious movies and a 15 year old's idea of adult
content."
With a combination of drinking, "blood (and)
tits," he believes that this is the controversial reason Rihanna's
video, "Bitch Better Have My Money," has become popular and insists
"whether you hate Rihanna's video or consider it the Citizen Kane of the
Vevo era, if you watched it, she wins." By mocking their work which
incorporates controversial subjects he therefore supports the argument
that the incorporation of controversy is used in a self-absorbed and
narcissistic manner, for the sake of it and to promote an artist. The article
finishes with a final expression of depreciation by even comparing Rihanna's
video, to what he believes to be a "more original, beautiful and
thought-proving" video with "a better song," that didn't need
controversy to be, as he believes, great.
This shows people may be too judgmental when it comes to viewing artists and their music videos. Lady Gaga, for example, is an artist who may not intentionally use controversy to gain attention, but it happens naturally as a result of her creative and positive ideas and messages she's trying to express. For example, she used religious references in her Judas music video, which many labelled as being controversial. This is because she plays the character of Mary Magdalene (an iconic figure of Christianity who is believed to be one of Jesus's followers) shown as being torn between Jesus and Judas (one of Jesus's disciples who betrayed him). If people actually looked at the message behind this, she is making a metaphorical statement about love, betrayal and forgiveness.
I therefore believe that as artists, people can use
their power and influence to be thought provoking, challenge people's views and
push the boundaries of what is deemed acceptable and controversial. Although
sometimes people may be offended, I think that the use of controversy is an
overall a beneficial, constructive and progressive part of society which help's
open people's minds and broaden their knowledge. Music videos can therefore be
outlets used by creative and intelligent people to make a difference. If it
includes controversy, I believe this can be even better as more people
may view a music video and therefore learn and spread a positive message from
it. Although, the opposite of this can be taken into account by thinking about
the Q Magazine article. Instead, by viewing controversial themes including
violence, sex and nudity, it may effect especially young and impressionable
individuals negatively as they could possibly see these themes as a reflection
of real life society.
No comments:
Post a Comment